The scruffy northern Indian town of Deoband is considered to be the birthplace of the Taliban.
The scruffy northern Indian town of Deoband is considered to be the birthplace of the Taliban.

Seminary weighed down by accusation



DEOBAND, INDIA // "Welcome to Darul Uloom's computer department," said a soft voice in halting English. "Look, this is where we breed terrorists." Wry chuckles filled the room, drowning out the hum of a ceiling fan. For Adil Siddiqui, whose job is to chaperone journalists visiting Darul Uloom, defensive humour is perhaps the only way left to dispel the myth that this century-and-a-half-old seminary is the ideological powerhouse of global jihad.

"The world thinks we are making bombs here," he said. "But as you can see for yourself, that isn't true." Darul Uloom, located in this grubby town in rural Uttar Pradesh in northern India, is believed to be the ideological birthplace of the Taliban. One of the largest and most influential seminaries in the world, perhaps second in prominence only to Al Azhar University in Egypt, Darul Uloom spawned Deobandism in the 19th century, an ideological strain of the Hanafi sect of Islam to which the Taliban, as well as several other militant groups such as Jaish-i-Mohammad and Harkat ul-Mujahideen, claim allegiance.

Currently there are 3,500 students enrolled in Darul Uloom, and the school has inspired thousands of seminaries across South Asia - about 1,500 in India alone. Although the Taliban in Afghanistan claimed descent from Deobandism, Darul Uloom and its clerics had no role in their enterprise. But in recent years, several students from this ultraconservative madrasa - as well as affiliated Deobandi madrasas across India - have been arrested on serious terrorism-related charges.

Prominent arrests include that of Mohammad Qasmi, a Darul Uloom graduate and a cleric from a small mosque in the town of Phulur in Uttar Pradesh. He was convicted on Aug 26 and sentenced to 13 years in prison for helping to carry out the 2006 bombing of the Sankat Mochan temple in Varanasi that killed 28 people. Sajjad Ahmad Wani, who had studied for several years at Darul Uloom, was arrested in December on charges of orchestrating bombings in Uttar Pradesh a month earlier that claimed 12 lives. The state police alleged he was a part of Harkat Jihad-e-Islami, a Bangladesh-based terrorism group.

Most recently, Abul Bashar Qasmi, another former student of Darul Uloom, was detained after it was alleged he was the mastermind behind the serial bombings in the western Indian city of Ahmedabad in July that killed 56 people. The arrests of former Darul Uloom students have cast doubt over this ultra-orthodox seminary. The accusations that the school somehow promotes terrorism makes its clerical establishment blanch.

In February, at a conference here, the school issued an "antiterror" fatwa strongly condemning those who take part in terrorist activities anywhere in the world. The seminary passed strictures against terrorism as unIslamic, and it defined terrorism as any action that hurts innocent individuals. Maulana Marghoob-ur-Rahman, the seminary's chief rector and vice chancellor, says he felt the need to do so because Darul Uloom was being labelled "dehshat ka adda" by many - Urdu for "a den of terror".

"Darul Uloom has always invited prejudices from the outside world," said Mr Rahman, who has been the school's vice chancellor for 27 years. "Whenever a bomb blast happens in India, fingers point at us. It's an unexamined belief that we foster terrorism." He added that because Islam is the cornerstone of Darul Uloom's identity, its students were targets of terrorist "insinuations". "If we were not teaching Islam, but engineering or medicine, we wouldn't be treated the same way."

But if that is the case, why single out Darul Uloom? To that, Mr Rahman had no coherent answers, knowing that India, with the second highest number of Muslims in the world after Indonesia, has more than 12,000 madrasas. Students, reluctant to give out their names, said prejudices about Darul Uloom's terrorism connections are taking their toll. "When I go to a non-Muslim neighbourhood," said one student from Surat, in Gujarat, "my presence invites fear the moment I mention I'm a student of this seminary. I'm treated like a criminal."

Experts say that even though the school may not be training jihadis directly, it perpetuates a narrow, literal interpretation of Islam, which is the ideology that inspires jihad. A Darul Uloom brochure openly criticises the United States and Israel, saying: "USA, Israel and the fascist lobby in India working under pressure of USA are making every possible effort for the character assassination of our institution. They are taking exception to the teachings of Islam and finding faults with it. It is because of this that mutual clashes are taking place ? and a new term 'terrorism' has been coined."

The Indian government recently announced an ambitious project to modernise education and infrastructure in the country's 12,000 madrasas. The Indian government says its aim is to encourage madrasas to move from rote learning - memorising the Quran - to critical thinking, where teachers ask students to research subjects and think about concepts - and to include science and mathematics in the core curriculum.

But Darul Uloom is resisting such a change. "What does modernisation mean?" said Maulana Arsad Madni, the former secretary of education of the school. "If it means stop preaching Islam, then we're not ready to modernise." However, he later acknowledged that Darul Uloom was offering computer courses to its students and teaching them English for one primary goal: to equip them to counter the negative publicity Islam now receives on the internet.

"Islam is 1,400 years old," Mr Madni said. "God's message hasn't changed over the years. So there's no reason for us to change."

The National's picks

4.35pm: Tilal Al Khalediah
5.10pm: Continous
5.45pm: Raging Torrent
6.20pm: West Acre
7pm: Flood Zone
7.40pm: Straight No Chaser
8.15pm: Romantic Warrior
8.50pm: Calandogan
9.30pm: Forever Young

Mercer, the investment consulting arm of US services company Marsh & McLennan, expects its wealth division to at least double its assets under management (AUM) in the Middle East as wealth in the region continues to grow despite economic headwinds, a company official said.

Mercer Wealth, which globally has $160 billion in AUM, plans to boost its AUM in the region to $2-$3bn in the next 2-3 years from the present $1bn, said Yasir AbuShaban, a Dubai-based principal with Mercer Wealth.

Within the next two to three years, we are looking at reaching $2 to $3 billion as a conservative estimate and we do see an opportunity to do so,” said Mr AbuShaban.

Mercer does not directly make investments, but allocates clients’ money they have discretion to, to professional asset managers. They also provide advice to clients.

“We have buying power. We can negotiate on their (client’s) behalf with asset managers to provide them lower fees than they otherwise would have to get on their own,” he added.

Mercer Wealth’s clients include sovereign wealth funds, family offices, and insurance companies among others.

From its office in Dubai, Mercer also looks after Africa, India and Turkey, where they also see opportunity for growth.

Wealth creation in Middle East and Africa (MEA) grew 8.5 per cent to $8.1 trillion last year from $7.5tn in 2015, higher than last year’s global average of 6 per cent and the second-highest growth in a region after Asia-Pacific which grew 9.9 per cent, according to consultancy Boston Consulting Group (BCG). In the region, where wealth grew just 1.9 per cent in 2015 compared with 2014, a pickup in oil prices has helped in wealth generation.

BCG is forecasting MEA wealth will rise to $12tn by 2021, growing at an annual average of 8 per cent.

Drivers of wealth generation in the region will be split evenly between new wealth creation and growth of performance of existing assets, according to BCG.

Another general trend in the region is clients’ looking for a comprehensive approach to investing, according to Mr AbuShaban.

“Institutional investors or some of the families are seeing a slowdown in the available capital they have to invest and in that sense they are looking at optimizing the way they manage their portfolios and making sure they are not investing haphazardly and different parts of their investment are working together,” said Mr AbuShaban.

Some clients also have a higher appetite for risk, given the low interest-rate environment that does not provide enough yield for some institutional investors. These clients are keen to invest in illiquid assets, such as private equity and infrastructure.

“What we have seen is a desire for higher returns in what has been a low-return environment specifically in various fixed income or bonds,” he said.

“In this environment, we have seen a de facto increase in the risk that clients are taking in things like illiquid investments, private equity investments, infrastructure and private debt, those kind of investments were higher illiquidity results in incrementally higher returns.”

The Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, one of the largest sovereign wealth funds, said in its 2016 report that has gradually increased its exposure in direct private equity and private credit transactions, mainly in Asian markets and especially in China and India. The authority’s private equity department focused on structured equities owing to “their defensive characteristics.”