Prof Jalal recently used a TV interview to condemn the militants' style of governing. He also repeatedly warned against unconditional international recognition of the Taliban regime. Photo: AFP
Prof Jalal recently used a TV interview to condemn the militants' style of governing. He also repeatedly warned against unconditional international recognition of the Taliban regime. Photo: AFP
Prof Jalal recently used a TV interview to condemn the militants' style of governing. He also repeatedly warned against unconditional international recognition of the Taliban regime. Photo: AFP
Prof Jalal recently used a TV interview to condemn the militants' style of governing. He also repeatedly warned against unconditional international recognition of the Taliban regime. Photo: AFP

Taliban arrest prominent critic in Kabul


  • English
  • Arabic

Afghanistan's Taliban government has confirmed overnight that an outspoken critic of the militant group has been arrested in Kabul.

Faizullah Jalal is a professor of law and political sciences at Kabul University. He is the husband of Afghanistan’s first female presidential candidate Dr Massouda Jalal, who also served for two years as the country's minister of women’s affairs under former president Hamid Karzai.

Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said Prof Jalal is accused of “inciting the people against the state and playing with people’s honour”.

He also shared screenshots of Prof Jalal’s Twitter account.

Prof Jalal’s family, who said he was taken from his home to an unknown location, claimed that the Twitter account does not belong to him and is a fake.

Soon after news of the arrest broke, Hasina Jalal – Prof Jalal's daughter – urged human rights organisations to back her calls for her father's immediate release.

Afghan and international human rights activists have expressed solidarity with the professor and are calling on the Taliban government to free him.

Amnesty International condemned the arrest and said the Taliban should "immediately and unconditionally" release him.

Horia Mosadiq, a human rights activist and executive director at the Conflict Analysis Network, wrote: “He did nothing but speak the truth. The Taliban are continuing to arrest, detain, torture and kill Afghans who think differently.”

Prof Jalal has criticised Afghanistan's political elites and publicly exposed them, even before the Taliban regained power in August last year.

He recently used a TV interview to condemn the militants' style of governing in front of a Taliban official. He also repeatedly warned against unconditional international recognition of the Taliban regime.

Austrian-Afghan journalist and author Emran Feroz said Prof Jalal "criticised the Taliban harshly and for good reason, like he did with the previous regime. Now he is in the hands of the Taliban.

"Everyone who cares about freedom of speech should push for his release."

Another Afghan journalist, Mujib Mashal of The New York Times, said: “Prof Jalal was among the few consistently clear and vocal on the corruption of the system, both under Karzai and [former president Ashraf] Ghani. He never minced words."

The arrest is fuelling concerns about freedom of expression in a Taliban-ruled Afghanistan.

“The Taliban’s arrest of Prof Jalal is a clear indication of their atrocities that impose restrictions on freedom of speech and strike fear into the heart of intellectuals and progressive individuals of the Afghan society,” wrote author and activist Nilofar Sakhi.

The Taliban initially assured the people of Afghanistan that their rights would be protected in accordance with Sharia.

But Shaharzad Akbar, a former head of the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission, said the Taliban are not honouring their commitments.

“The Taliban made great promises during the 'peace' talks regarding respect for women's Islamic rights and freedom of expression," Ms Akbar said.

"Now they are afraid of imagining girls being educated, and critics are imprisoned and tortured. This amount of lying, hypocrisy and animosity with women and critics is nauseating."

For many human rights activists, Taliban rule has meant limits being placed on people's right to criticise their government.

“Because, in the Taliban’s world, you have no right to complain or criticise,” said Patricia Gossman, associate Asia director of Human Rights Watch.

The move may also affect the militants' push for recognition. The international community has said an inclusive state and respect for human and women's rights are fundamental preconditions for recognition of a Taliban government.

UAE currency: the story behind the money in your pockets
Ultra processed foods

- Carbonated drinks, sweet or savoury packaged snacks, confectionery, mass-produced packaged breads and buns 

- margarines and spreads; cookies, biscuits, pastries, cakes, and cake mixes, breakfast cereals, cereal and energy bars;

- energy drinks, milk drinks, fruit yoghurts and fruit drinks, cocoa drinks, meat and chicken extracts and instant sauces

- infant formulas and follow-on milks, health and slimming products such as powdered or fortified meal and dish substitutes,

- many ready-to-heat products including pre-prepared pies and pasta and pizza dishes, poultry and fish nuggets and sticks, sausages, burgers, hot dogs, and other reconstituted meat products, powdered and packaged instant soups, noodles and desserts.

The specs

Engine: 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo

Power: 178hp at 5,500rpm

Torque: 280Nm at 1,350-4,200rpm

Transmission: seven-speed dual-clutch auto

Price: from Dh209,000 

On sale: now

Why are asylum seekers being housed in hotels?

The number of asylum applications in the UK has reached a new record high, driven by those illegally entering the country in small boats crossing the English Channel.

A total of 111,084 people applied for asylum in the UK in the year to June 2025, the highest number for any 12-month period since current records began in 2001.

Asylum seekers and their families can be housed in temporary accommodation while their claim is assessed.

The Home Office provides the accommodation, meaning asylum seekers cannot choose where they live.

When there is not enough housing, the Home Office can move people to hotels or large sites like former military bases.

Updated: January 09, 2022, 2:53 PM