In his latest weekly column called National Interest, veteran Indian journalist Shekhar Gupta barely conceals his excitement at the prospect of, as he sees it, "economic ideology becoming the new binary in Indian politics".
Last week’s annual budget session in Parliament provided the setting for his thesis. Prime Minister Narendra Modi made the case for embracing India’s private sector, while opposition leader Rahul Gandhi took his own party to the left on the issue.
Gupta's excitement is understandable. Although we should expect this and little else during a budget session, it is more common these days for politicians from India's two mainstream parties to spar over social and cultural issues than it is for them to engage in a spirited debate on economic policy. Mr Modi is attempting to move the national conversation in a new direction at a time when India's Covid-19-battered economy desperately needs reinvention. This should be welcome – even if debated robustly.
The broader context for the debate is the uncertain fate of three contentious agriculture laws that the Modi government passed in September.
Security personnel clash with demonstrators during a rally in support of Indian farmers. The farmers are protesting at various locations at the capital, New Delhi. EPA
A protester is surrounded by security personnel at a demonstration in support of farmers, in New Delhi, India. Reuters
A demonstrator is held back behind a police shield at a rally in support of Indian farmers in New Delhi, India. Farmers are protesting against new farming laws. Reuters
Security personnel and protesters clash at a demonstration in solidarity with Indian farmers in New Delhi, India. Farmers say new laws leave them at the mercy of corporations. EPA
Security personnel, some carrying 'lathi' sticks for crowd control, block a road in New Delhi, India, during a protest in support of farmers. EPA
Indian National Congress leader Rahul Gandhi arrives at press conference in New Delhi, India. Congress has called for the new farming laws to be repealed. EPA
Rakesh Tikait, a leader of Bharatiya Kisan Union farmers' group, is helped onstage at a Maha Panchayat village council meeting, in Kandela village, Jind district, Haryana state, India. Reuters
Rakesh Tikait, a leader of Bharatiya Kisan Union farmers' organisation at a grand village council meeting in Kandela village, Jind district, in Haryana state, India. Reuters
Rakesh Tikait, a leader of Bharatiya Kisan Union farmers' group, turns from the crowd at a grand village council meeting at Kandela village, Jind district, in Haryana state, India. Reuters
Farmers and supporters attend a grand village council meeting at Kandela village, Jind district, in Haryana state, India. Reuters
Protesting farmers encounter barbed wire and barricades placed by security personnel at the Delhi Ghazipur Border, near New Delhi, India. EPA
Indian lawyers from Punjab state attend a protest by farmers at the Delhi Ghazipur Border, near New Delhi, India. EPA
Villagers leave after a grand village council meeting as part of farmers' protests against farming laws, at Kandela, Jind district, in Haryana state, India. Reuters
Indian farmers with tractors and trailers protesting at the Delhi Ghazipur Border near New Delhi, India. EPA
Protesting Indian farmers rest in a trailer at the Delhi Ghazipur Border near New Delhi, India. EPA
Indian National Congress leader Rahul Gandhi addresses a press conference in New Delhi, India. Congress has backed the protesting farmers. EPA
In sum, these laws will "allow farmers to produce crops as per contracts with corporate investors for a mutually agreed remuneration". They intend, essentially, to give farmers the freedom to engage with agri-businesses directly, thereby liberating them from the so-called tyranny of government-sanctioned markets.
Aside from objecting to the government’s haste in passing these laws, which followed little consultation with politicians across the aisle or relevant farmer groups, opposition parties say they will lead to the corporatisation of agriculture.
Millions of farmers agree, particularly those belonging to the northern states of Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh, which have for decades benefited the most from price guarantees and other interventions. They fear big corporations will tie them to unfavourable contracts with liability clauses that are hard to comprehend. Being at the mercy of the market, in addition to monsoons, is also a source of great anxiety.
And so, since November, the outskirts of Delhi, the Indian capital, have provided the stage for some of the largest protests in human history. Last month, the Supreme Court stayed the implementation of the laws for 18 months, during which time a panel of court-appointed experts will study them and hold consultations with agricultural professionals and academics. But despite the government's pledge to make concessions, the farmers' unions remain adamant that the laws be repealed.
The laws are not perfect, and the manner in which they were passed has justifiably drawn criticism. But to his credit, Mr Modi is persisting with them. India is a notoriously difficult country to legislate reforms, let alone implement them. Mr Modi has caved before, such as when, in 2015, he ruled out passing sweeping land acquisition reforms after his administration was called “suit-boot ki sarkar” – a government of and for the rich. That he is standing his ground this time has animated some of the leading lights of India’s mainstream media, including those critical of his right-wing, Hindu nationalist politics.
Rahul Gandhi's 'suit-boot ki sarkar' jibe in 2015 forced the Modi government to backtrack on enacting land acquisition reforms. EPA
"Narendra Modi's approach to economic issues has changed, the dividing marker being the 2019 re-election with an improved majority 21 months ago," TN Ninan remarked in the Business Standard newspaper. "The idea that the government wants to oppress farmers, who make up about half the country's work force, is absurd. If anything, it's trying to help them by allowing market forces to generate prosperity," Sadanand Dhume wrote in The Wall Street Journal. "Modi and his advisers should be under no illusions about the price of retreat," Mihir Sharma warned in an op-ed for the New Delhi-based Observer Research Foundation.
But it is Gupta’s argument that is most intriguing, albeit with some flaws in it.
In his piece, he writes that no prime minister has shown the courage to make a vociferous pitch for privatisation, because Indians by and large continue to live with a socialist mindset ingrained in them since the nation’s founding. Gupta rightly points out that past reforms, including the liberalisation of the economy in 1991, have been carried out either quietly or quickly – “by stealth” – for fear of attracting public anger and political retribution. Mr Modi’s mentor, former prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, used the term “disinvestment” even as his government went on a privatisation and deregulation spree in the 2000s.
Those are both valid observations. But Gupta may still be rushing to judgement about Mr Modi’s conviction about privatisation (and more broadly about capitalism), as well as the assertion that the budget session marks an epoch in India’s political history. For one, if the Prime Minister had the courage of his convictions, why did he need to pass the farm laws by stealth?
The late Indian prime ministers, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, left, and PV Narasimha Rao, will be remembered as reformers. AP Photo
It is also a stretch to define the ideological divide between Mr Modi and Mr Gandhi on purely economic lines, or to expect that economic ideology will drive Indian politics from hereon.
In a country where the scale of diversity ensures that identity politics "won’t go gentle into that good night", it is hard to imagine a majority of people voting based on their economic preferences. Aspirational though millions of Indians are, binaries such as capitalist/socialist and protectionist/free market-oriented find less purchase than religious, caste or tribal identity.
Politics is no doubt personal. Mr Gandhi has a track record for favouring socialist policies. Some of the Congress party-led schemes, while in government from 2004 to 2014, could be credited to his thinking. If his party were to return to power, he will most likely push for universal basic income.
But in some ways, Mr Modi is cut from the same cloth. He claims to believe in limited government. Yet, over the past six-and-a-half years, some of his policies – notably on industry – have resembled those of the 1970s, when socialism was at its peak in the country. Import substitution, a term rarely heard since the 1991 reforms, has made a comeback. In 2019, India chose the protectionist route by refusing to join the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership – a decision that has coincided with a steady rise in tariffs. The consequent decline in global competitiveness of Indian products across sectors has prompted the Confederation of Indian Industry to make urgent policy recommendations.
Leaders and trade ministers of 15 Asia-Pacific nations signed the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership in Hanoi, Vietnam, last month. Asean's great strength is that it is the convener and originator of the economic and diplomatic architecture of the Asia-Pacific, including RCEP, the world's largest trade deal. EPA
It is also a stretch to define the ideological divide between Modi and Gandhi on purely economic lines
Apart from taking protectionist measures, Mr Modi's focus on welfarism for much of his first term in office might even win him the moniker of “right-wing socialist”.
The pandemic, however, seems to have sparked fresh thinking. Amid the uproar over the farm laws, this government also passed key labour reforms last year. Its scheme to lure non-resident Indians to do business in the country, as New Delhi looks to boost foreign direct investment, could be a smart move. Might Mr Modi walk back some of his previous policies?
It also remains to be seen whether the Prime Minister’s state-led development model, one that was adopted in East Asia decades earlier, will succeed in boosting investment and job opportunities in the country. As Rupa Subramanya wrote in Nikkei Asia, the Prime Minister’s ability to replicate South Korea’s “chaebol” system of promoting large home-grown industrial conglomerates will depend on exports growth and rapid economic expansion. His credibility is also at stake amid the opposition's charge that he is a crony capitalist who favours certain corporate houses.
Regardless, Mr Modi’s use of his considerable political capital to focus on economic rejuvenation is a necessary step. Failure is simply not an option.
Chitrabhanu Kadalayil is an assistant comment editor at The National
The ad Amul issued after Rahul Gandhi hugged Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Parliament in 2019. The two leaders are not that apart in some ways. Amul / daCunha Communications
UAE currency: the story behind the money in your pockets
All games 6pm UAE on Sunday:
Arsenal v Watford
Burnley v Brighton
Chelsea v Wolves
Crystal Palace v Tottenham
Everton v Bournemouth
Leicester v Man United
Man City v Norwich
Newcastle v Liverpool
Southampton v Sheffield United
West Ham v Aston Villa
Red Jersey
General Classification: worn daily, starting from Stage 2, by the leader of the General Classification by time. Green Jersey
Points Classification: worn daily, starting from Stage 2, by the fastest sprinter, who has obtained the best positions in each stage and intermediate sprints. White Jersey
Young Rider Classification: worn daily, starting from Stage 2, by the best young rider born after January 1, 1995 in the overall classification by time (U25). Black Jersey
Intermediate Sprint Classification: worn daily, starting from Stage 2, by the rider who has gained the most Intermediate Sprint Points.
Sharrie Williams
The American singer is hugely respected in blues circles due to her passionate vocals and songwriting. Born and raised in Michigan, Williams began recording and touring as a teenage gospel singer. Her career took off with the blues band The Wiseguys. Such was the acclaim of their live shows that they toured throughout Europe and in Africa. As a solo artist, Williams has also collaborated with the likes of the late Dizzy Gillespie, Van Morrison and Mavis Staples. Lin Rountree
An accomplished smooth jazz artist who blends his chilled approach with R‘n’B. Trained at the Duke Ellington School of the Arts in Washington, DC, Rountree formed his own band in 2004. He has also recorded with the likes of Kem, Dwele and Conya Doss. He comes to Dubai on the back of his new single Pass The Groove, from his forthcoming 2018 album Stronger Still, which may follow his five previous solo albums in cracking the top 10 of the US jazz charts. Anita Williams
Dubai-based singer Anita Williams will open the night with a set of covers and swing, jazz and blues standards that made her an in-demand singer across the emirate. The Irish singer has been performing in Dubai since 2008 at venues such as MusicHall and Voda Bar. Her Jazz Garden appearance is career highlight as she will use the event to perform the original song Big Blue Eyes, the single from her debut solo album, due for release soon.
Olympic-size swimming pool with a split bulkhead for multi-use configurations, including water polo and 50m/25m training lanes
Premier League-standard football pitch
400m Olympic running track
NBA-spec basketball court with auditorium
600-seat auditorium
Spaces for historical and cultural exploration
An elevated football field that doubles as a helipad
Specialist robotics and science laboratories
AR and VR-enabled learning centres
Disruption Lab and Research Centre for developing entrepreneurial skills
Farage on Muslim Brotherhood
Nigel Farage told Reform's annual conference that the party will proscribe the Muslim Brotherhood if he becomes Prime Minister. "We will stop dangerous organisations with links to terrorism operating in our country," he said. "Quite why we've been so gutless about this – both Labour and Conservative – I don't know. “All across the Middle East, countries have banned and proscribed the Muslim Brotherhood as a dangerous organisation. We will do the very same.” It is 10 years since a ground-breaking report into the Muslim Brotherhood by Sir John Jenkins. Among the former diplomat's findings was an assessment that “the use of extreme violence in the pursuit of the perfect Islamic society” has “never been institutionally disowned” by the movement. The prime minister at the time, David Cameron, who commissioned the report, said membership or association with the Muslim Brotherhood was a "possible indicator of extremism" but it would not be banned.
Yahya Al Ghassani's bio
Date of birth: April 18, 1998
Playing position: Winger
Clubs: 2015-2017 – Al Ahli Dubai; March-June 2018 – Paris FC; August – Al Wahda
Blockchain is a form of distributed ledger technology, a digital system in which data is recorded across multiple places at the same time. Unlike traditional databases, DLTs have no central administrator or centralised data storage. They are transparent because the data is visible and, because they are automatically replicated and impossible to be tampered with, they are secure.
The main difference between blockchain and other forms of DLT is the way data is stored as ‘blocks’ – new transactions are added to the existing ‘chain’ of past transactions, hence the name ‘blockchain’. It is impossible to delete or modify information on the chain due to the replication of blocks across various locations.
Blockchain is mostly associated with cryptocurrency Bitcoin. Due to the inability to tamper with transactions, advocates say this makes the currency more secure and safer than traditional systems. It is maintained by a network of people referred to as ‘miners’, who receive rewards for solving complex mathematical equations that enable transactions to go through.
However, one of the major problems that has come to light has been the presence of illicit material buried in the Bitcoin blockchain, linking it to the dark web.
Other blockchain platforms can offer things like smart contracts, which are automatically implemented when specific conditions from all interested parties are reached, cutting the time involved and the risk of mistakes. Another use could be storing medical records, as patients can be confident their information cannot be changed. The technology can also be used in supply chains, voting and has the potential to used for storing property records.
