Gerald Du / Unsplash
Gerald Du / Unsplash
Gerald Du / Unsplash
Gerald Du / Unsplash


Post-Covid education is leaving too many pupils behind


Saima Rana
Saima Rana
  • English
  • Arabic

August 23, 2024

Two years after the end of the Covid-19 pandemic, the global education sector has made remarkable strides in addressing the challenges posed by the crisis. The pandemic disrupted education systems worldwide, forcing millions of children out of classrooms and into relative isolation. The experience exposed and exacerbated existing inequalities. Reversing the impact on a generation of children has not been easy.

As we reflect on progress, the road to recovery has been uneven, with significant disparities between high-income and low-income countries. Understanding these differences is crucial for developing tailored strategies that can effectively support all pupils, regardless of their socioeconomic background.

In high-income countries, the availability of resources has played a critical role in the recovery process. These nations have been able to invest heavily in catch-up programmes, digital infrastructure and other initiatives designed to mitigate the impact of school closures. Many schools in these countries quickly transitioned to online learning, leveraging their existing digital infrastructure to maintain continuity in education. This rapid adaptation was possible because of the higher levels of connectivity and access to technology that are typical in wealthier nations.

In contrast, low and middle-income countries have faced far greater challenges in mobilising resources for education recovery. Many of these nations struggled to provide even the most basic remote learning options during the pandemic. The digital divide between rich and poor countries became starkly apparent as schools in low-income regions lacked the necessary technology and infrastructure to support online education. As a result, pupils in these areas experienced more severe learning losses, with some missing out on education entirely during extended periods of school closures.

The extent of these learning losses also varied significantly within countries, often reflecting pre-existing inequalities. In the US, for instance, pupils in majority-black schools fell behind by half a year in mathematics and reading, while their peers in majority-white schools were only two months behind. This gap highlights how the pandemic disproportionately affected historically vulnerable and marginalised pupils, further entrenching educational inequalities that have long existed.

The policy focus in response to these challenges has also differed markedly between high-income and low-income countries. In wealthier nations, there has been a strong emphasis on digitalisation and addressing specific learning gaps. Governments and education providers in these countries have prioritised integrating digital technologies into their education systems, not just as a temporary solution but as a long-term strategy for enhancing learning outcomes. There has also been a push towards reimagining education, focusing on innovation and adaptation to new realities brought about by the pandemic.

Conversely, low and middle-income countries have had to prioritise more immediate and fundamental concerns. The focus in these regions has been on addressing broader educational inequalities and improving basic infrastructure. For many of these countries, the pandemic underscored the need to strengthen the foundational aspects of their education systems, such as ensuring access to quality education for all children, improving teachers' professional development, and providing essential learning materials. These efforts are crucial for closing the learning gaps that have widened during the pandemic and for preventing further disparities from emerging.

One of the most inspiring aspects of the education sector's response to the pandemic has been the resilience and creativity shown by educators and students alike

Equity remains a central concern across all nations, but the challenges are more pronounced in low-income countries. In these regions, educational inequalities are often exacerbated by limited access to resources and opportunities. Higher education tends to amplify existing socioeconomic disparities, as pupils from wealthier backgrounds are more likely to have the means to pursue advanced studies, while those from poorer backgrounds face significant barriers. Addressing these inequalities requires not only focused interventions but also a commitment to ensuring that education is accessible and equitable for all.

As we look to the future, it is essential to recognise that the global response to educational challenges must be tailored to the specific contexts and needs of different regions. High-income countries can use their resources and technological advancements to drive innovation and reimagine their education systems for a post-pandemic world. Meanwhile, low and middle-income countries must focus on strengthening the foundational aspects of their education systems to ensure that all pupils, regardless of their background, can succeed.

One of the most inspiring aspects of the education sector's response to the pandemic has been the resilience and creativity shown by educators and pupils alike. In both high-income and low-income countries, teachers have adapted to new ways of teaching, often under challenging circumstances. They have found innovative solutions to keep pupils engaged and motivated, whether through online platforms, community-based learning initiatives, or other means. This adaptability and determination are key to overcoming the challenges that remain.

The pandemic has highlighted the importance of well-being in education. Schools have recognised that supporting pupils' mental health and emotional well-being is as crucial as addressing academic gaps. In many cases, educators have gone above and beyond to create safe and supportive environments where pupils can recover not just academically but also socially and emotionally. This holistic approach to education is vital for helping pupils build resilience and regain confidence as they navigate the ongoing uncertainties of the pandemic era.

Signs remind people to wear a mask at the Swiss International Scientific School, Dubai, during the Covid-19 pandemic. The disease was a wake-up call, alerting us to how crucial education is – not only for academic development but also for pupils' overall wellbeing and resilience. Chris Whiteoak / The National
Signs remind people to wear a mask at the Swiss International Scientific School, Dubai, during the Covid-19 pandemic. The disease was a wake-up call, alerting us to how crucial education is – not only for academic development but also for pupils' overall wellbeing and resilience. Chris Whiteoak / The National

While significant progress has been made, the journey towards full recovery is still by no means complete. The pandemic has forced us to rethink what education means and how it should be delivered. It has highlighted the need for greater equity, not just within countries but around the globe. As we continue to rebuild, it is imperative that we learn from the experiences of the past two years and use them to create more inclusive, resilient and adaptable education systems.

The Covid-19 pandemic has been a wake-up call, alerting us to how crucial education is – not only for academic development but also for the overall well-being and resilience of pupils. Schools are more than places of learning; they are communities that provide children with the resources to deal with the complexities of life. The crisis has reminded us of the preciousness of life and the essential role education plays in shaping the future. Our schools must continue to focus on nurturing every aspect of a child's development, helping them grow into well-rounded individuals who can face challenges with confidence and compassion.

While the pandemic presented the education sector with unprecedented challenges, it also underscored the vital importance of schools in fostering resilience and well-being. By addressing disparities, prioritising equity, and embracing a holistic approach to education, we can ensure that every child is equipped with the tools they need to thrive in an ever-changing world. As we move forward, let us commit to making education a force for good, empowering future generations to lead meaningful and fulfilling lives.

Australia men's Test cricket fixtures 2021/22

One-off Test v Afghanistan:
Nov 27-Dec 1: Blundstone Arena, Hobart

The Ashes v England:
Dec 8-12: 1st Test, Gabba, Brisbane
Dec 16-20: 2nd Test, Adelaide Oval, Adelaide (day/night)
Dec 26-30: 3rd Test, Melbourne Cricket Ground, Melbourne
Jan 5-9, 2022: 4th Test, Sydney Cricket Ground, Sydney
Jan 14-18: 5th Test, Optus Stadium, Perth

Notable groups (UAE time)

Jordan Spieth, Si Woo Kim, Henrik Stenson (12.47pm)

Justin Thomas, Justin Rose, Louis Oosthuizen (12.58pm)

Hideki Matsuyama, Brooks Koepka, Tommy Fleetwood (1.09pm)

Sergio Garcia, Jason Day, Zach Johnson (4.04pm)

Rickie Fowler, Paul Casey, Adam Scott (4.26pm)

Dustin Johnson, Charl Schwartzel, Rory McIlroy (5.48pm)

UAE currency: the story behind the money in your pockets
UAE currency: the story behind the money in your pockets
Difference between fractional ownership and timeshare

Although similar in its appearance, the concept of a fractional title deed is unlike that of a timeshare, which usually involves multiple investors buying “time” in a property whereby the owner has the right to occupation for a specified period of time in any year, as opposed to the actual real estate, said John Peacock, Head of Indirect Tax and Conveyancing, BSA Ahmad Bin Hezeem & Associates, a law firm.

Islamophobia definition

A widely accepted definition was made by the All Party Parliamentary Group on British Muslims in 2019: “Islamophobia is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness.” It further defines it as “inciting hatred or violence against Muslims”.

The fake news generation

288,000 – the number of posts reported as hate speech that were deleted by Facebook globally each month in May and June this year

11% – the number of Americans who said they trusted the news they read on Snapchat as of June 2017, according to Statista. Over a quarter stated that they ‘rarely trusted’ the news they read on social media in general

31% - the number of young people in the US aged between 10 and 18 who said they had shared a news story online in the last six months that they later found out was wrong or inaccurate

63% - percentage of Arab nationals who said they get their news from social media every single day.

Updated: August 26, 2024, 4:26 AM