South Africa says 'no reasonable basis' for remaining on UK red list

South Africa has criticised Britain's decision to keep the country on its coronavirus "red list", forcing travellers into a pricey hotel quarantine on their return to the UK.

High-paying foreign tourists are slowly returning to experience South Africa's wildlife and natural vistas, after being shut off from the rest of the world in 2020.

When the Beta variant was found in December, more countries blacklisted South Africa - a crippling blow as tourism directly accounts for three per cent of the nation's economy. Before the pandemic, tourism provided more than 700,000 jobs.

Most travellers coming from Europe and the US, South Africa's biggest tourism markets along with the UK, can currently holiday and then self-isolate at home upon return - a hassle that some are prepared to take.

But the UK has kept South Africa on its red list of high-risk countries, meaning anyone arriving from South Africa is forced to quarantine in a hotel for 10 days, costing more than $2,400 per person.

The high cost rules the country out for most British tourists.

Once a colonial power, Britain sent more than 400,000 visitors a year in pre-pandemic times - more than any country outside the continent.

Some British citizens such as Claire Alexander have been stuck in South Africa for over a year because of the costly restrictions.

"I've just spoken to my 91-year papa in Stirling and it's pretty sore knowing I can't get home," said the mother of two, whose youngest child has yet to meet "his Scottish clan".

What's more, Britain won't recognise vaccines administered anywhere in Africa - even if the shots came from Britain.

"If you send us vaccines and you say, 'we don't recognise those vaccines', it sends a very challenging message for us," said John Nkengasong, head of the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention.

Marc Mendelson, an infectious disease expert from Britain who is based at the University of Cape Town, said he was "embarrassed" by his home country's government.

"Misinformation, misrepresentation, outdated & inaccurate science," he tweeted this week.

The British embassy in Pretoria acknowledged that South Africa's cases were going down, but said concerns remained "about the continued presence of Beta given its potential ability to circumvent vaccines".

Adrian Puren of the National Institute for Communicable Diseases told AFP that the Beta variant was now "undetectable" and that concerns over its vaccine resistance were "moot".

Leading genomics expert Tulio de Oliveira said South Africa had a higher vaccination rate than some non-red listed countries - including India, where the Delta variant first appeared.

"We have a smaller number of infections than the UK," de Oliveira said. "So why this discrimination?"

Daily new cases in South Africa peaked at the end of June at just over 26,000, but are now under 3,000 a day. Britain is seeing 10 times as many new cases a day.

Vaccinations, meanwhile, are picking up after a slow start, with around 20 per cent of South African adults fully jabbed.

South African tourism groups are lobbying London to remove the red tag as peak season nears, when snow birds leave the northern hemisphere's winter.

Director of luxury holiday booker Discover Africa Group, Andre Van Kets, argued the measures no longer made sense given infection and vaccination rates were "moving in the right direction".

British tourists are enquiring for 2022 and 2023, he said, but often pull out when asked to pay a deposit.

"There is no reasonable basis for keeping South Africa on the red list," Foreign Minister Naledi Pandor said this week in a statement touting the country's "robust vaccination programme and excellent science".

"It's ridiculous," said Andre Retief of tour operator Safari With Us, which has relied on the UK for 20 to 30 per cent of its bookings.

"Covid is all over the world now and coming on safari is actually quite safe."