Why the bond market chaos could be a 'moral hazard' for investors

In their campaign to bring rampant inflation under control , the world’s major central banks could end up fuelling further chaos in bond markets that play crucial roles for the economies they are trying to protect. Policymakers, in a rush to rein in consumer prices, are quickly lifting interest rates and ending programmes that made them the dominant buyers of government debt in places such as the US, Europe and Australia. Investors have yet to pick up the slack , helping to create a liquidity drought that has led to historic swings in yields in recent months. “Worst we have ever seen” is how Andrew Brenner, head of international fixed income at NatAlliance Securities, characterises conditions in the bond market. “Central banks ruined liquidity from what it used to be.” From Sydney to Frankfurt to New York, market weaknesses long hidden by ultra-easy monetary policies are being exposed, stoking concern about potentially painful disruptions that could ricochet into other markets and the economy as a whole. Once-boring German bunds are jumping around by the most on record while Australian bond futures are near their most volatile in 11 years. Japanese bankers are struggling with days when not a single benchmark bond trades. But it is in the $23 trillion US Treasuries market where the dislocations are causing the most trouble, stoking angst from investors and regulators alike about what can be done to shore up this crucial global financial linchpin. With US Treasuries serving as the risk-free benchmark for more than $50tn of fixed-income assets, extreme volatility in their yields could make it tougher for private companies to raise capital easily and at the lowest possible cost. The market gyrations also threaten to introduce chaos into what traditionally has been the preferred asset class for pension funds, retirees and other investors looking for the safest possible investment returns. And all of this, in turn, could pose risks for the broader economy that eventually may force central banks to change their plans. The European Central Bank is already working on a programme to limit premiums on lower-rated government debt in the euro area. In the US, the lack of Federal Reserve purchase of Treasuries has affected trading — and some dealers are even saying dislocations in money markets may put pressure on the regulator to scale back its plans to shrink its portfolio that had swollen to about $9tn due to quantitative-easing bond buying. “We are now seeing outsize intraday yield moves in the US, as well as in European markets,” says Lawrence Gillum, a fixed-income strategist at LPL Financial. “If we start to see more cracks in markets, the Fed will be in a really tough situation — because they will be trying to fight inflation on one hand and on the other trying to support the smooth functioning of the Treasury market.” One issue that has increasingly come into focus is the legacy of measures to strengthen the banking system after the 2008 global financial crisis. Tighter capital rules and restrictions on the use of leverage have made banks less willing to expand their government-bond trading capacity, leaving one of the market’s most crucial sources of liquidity hamstrung. That was not as much of an issue when central banks were sopping up the trillions of dollars of securities that governments were issuing to fund the battle against economic fallout from the Covid-19 pandemic. But a dearth of market-making by banks is problematic now as the Fed and many of its counterparts scale down their debt holdings. “The size of the market has grown quite substantially,” says Rob Nicholl, who heads the Australian Office of Financial Management, which oversees the country’s debt issuance. Without market-making capacity keeping up, “when you get periods of volatility, you are almost mathematically going to get periods where liquidity disappears more quickly”. While concerns about bond-market liquidity have been percolating for years, the fears are indisputably coming to fruition in 2022. The dynamic is on display as intraday yield swings of more than 10 basis points become commonplace across most major markets. On Monday, 10-year Treasury yields dropped by about 8 basis points by the end of the day, after rising 4 bps in the morning. A Bloomberg measure of Treasury liquidity is near its worst level since trading seized up in the spring of 2020 at the onset of Covid-19. Barclays strategists highlight other metrics, including higher transaction costs. In Europe, German bonds have been rocked by the highest volatility on record by some measures, as investors confront both an end to the ECB’s quantitative easing and a deeply uncertain rate-increase cycle — all as trading volumes recede during the summer months. That means the yield on a security could be drastically different between when an investor makes a trade and a few moments later. “Doesn’t matter if it is outright levels, spreads or curves, all moves could be obsolete within minutes and see proper U-turns anytime,” says Jens-Christian Haeussermann, a government bond trader at Germany’s Commerzbank. “Liquidity drained dramatically.” The wildness of trading in US bonds has unsettled some international investors — an important group of buyers for American debt. “What is taking place recently are moves irrelevant to any news or events — and that suggests players could be scrambling to cover positions,” says Eiichiro Miura, general manager of the fixed-income department at Nissay Asset Management, a unit of Japan’s biggest life insurer. Mr Miura’s home market is not immune from liquidity challenges, although problems in Japan are centred on how much the Bank of Japan has bought, rather than the end of purchases. One legacy of years of massive bond buying by the BoJ — it now holds about half of the government bond market — is that there is simply not much supply available for investors. Japan’s bond buyers are finding it harder to complete transactions since any period outside the 2008 global credit crunch. There have been bouts of low volume in both the cash market for government securities and in futures. Sellers failed to deliver 3.53tn yen ($26 billion) of government bonds in June, the second-largest amount ever in BoJ data going back to 2001. Similar problems are visible in Europe, and are poised to worsen. A regulatory measure that comes into force in September will compel hundreds of asset managers to post more collateral — at a time when there is fewer high-quality investments available to serve that role. Germany’s free float — or the amount of its debt available to the general market — is at record lows, according to Bloomberg Intelligence. With risk-free securities more difficult to trade, this is undermining the environment for the tens of trillions of dollars worth of assets that are benchmarked against them — which are called spread products. Without incentives to big banks to add market-making liquidity, the risk is that costs will be borne by borrowers and investors across asset markets. “While sovereign bond markets are still functioning very well, price makers’ appetite to hold any risk positions is much lower than normal,” says James Wilson, a senior portfolio manager in Melbourne, Australia, at Jamieson Coote Bonds. That has been the case “especially for spread products — leaving markets jumpy and prone to the very wide daily ranges we have seen lately”. Despite the volatility, not everyone sees evidence of structural problems in global bond markets. Fed chairman Jerome Powell told politicians in June that the Treasuries market was functioning “reasonably well”. However, former US treasury secretary Timothy Geithner is among those urging structural reforms to address liquidity issues as the Fed’s footprint in the market shrinks. For Kevin McPartland, head of market-structure research at Greenwich Associates, it is not clear if the bond market is “just broken” or if this type of action is simply what is to be expected during an especially volatile period. Regardless, the situation invokes the old notion of “moral hazard” — or the risk that aggressive policies of central bankers can distort market prices and eventually burn investors when they are reversed. “It is hard to take the punch bowl away,” Mr McPartland says, referring to the withdrawal of loose monetary policy. “Everyone has gotten so used to the Fed backstop. It is hard to say if the market needs it or has just grown accustomed to it. I really wonder about the moral hazard idea.” _____________

Why the bond market chaos could be a 'moral hazard' for investors

The aggressive policies of central bankers to fight inflation will distort market prices and eventually burn investors when they are reversed, analysts say