Nissan’s directors failed to name a successor for Carlos Ghosn amid a widening rift with partner Renault SA on governance issues that prompted Japanese prosecutors to jail the iconic executive and also indict the carmaker.
The board instead chose to appoint a new committee to improve corporate governance, chief executive Hiroto Saikawa told reporters Monday after a meeting of the directors. The committee will give its recommendations by March 2019, almost four months after the November 19 jailing of Mr Ghosn and his hasty ouster as Nissan’s chairman three days later. The board may wait until the committee’s comments before naming a chairman, Mr Saikawa said.
The decision to wait further comes as Renault, Nissan’s largest shareholder and the company that bailed out the Japanese automaker two decades back, sent a letter demanding a meeting of all shareholders to discuss Nissan’s difficulties. Mr Ghosn’s arrest has escalated tensions between the companies, whose car alliance - the world’s largest - has been held together by Mr Ghosn throughout its existence.
Mr Ghosn, 64, was arrested in Tokyo for alleged understatement of his income, and on December 10 he and the company were indicted by Japanese prosecutors over the suspected misconduct. The company’s indictment has expanded the scrutiny beyond Mr Ghosn and raised questions about Nissan’s corporate governance.
It has also cast attention on the leadership of Mr Saikawa, so much so that his job may even be on the line, according to analysts and people familiar with the situation inside the company.
____________
Read more:
Renault to keep Carlos Ghosn as CEO
Ghosn appeal rejected as former Nissan chief re-arrested on new charges
Nissan moves to block Ghosn access to Rio flat
Ghosn's arrest may spur global backlash against Japan
____________
Mr Saikawa’s apparent caution at Monday’s press conference was in stark contrast to that of November 19 in which he attacked Mr Ghosn for having too much power and questioned how one executive alone could take the credit for the turnaround of Nissan.
None of those attacks were there on Monday when Mr Saikawa was a lot more matter-of-fact and ended the press conference in about 30 minutes.
While Nissan ousted Mr Ghosn, Renault technically kept him on as chairman and chief executive while it seeks more information and evidence about the accusations. In a sign of a deepening divide between the partners, Renault is pushing Nissan to call a shareholder meeting as soon as possible to discuss the Japanese automaker’s indictment, governance and the French company’s appointees on Nissan’s board, people familiar with the matter have said.
Nissan, meanwhile, has long been unhappy about what it considers an outsized French role in the partnership, and is seeking to redress perceived imbalances, people familiar with the matter have said. Officially, Nissan has said it is committed to the partnership and on Monday it pledged to keep its alliance partners fully informed.
Nissan conducted a months-long probe into Mr Ghosn’s financial reporting and alleged misuse of company assets. A former Ghosn protege, Mr Saikawa has been Nissan’s chief executive since last year and has emerged as a driving force in the investigation.
The timing of the company’s probe prompted some analysts to say the scandal may have been manufactured in order to block a merger that Mr Ghosn was advocating between Nissan and Renault. Mr Saikawa has denied that such a motive was behind the investigation.
Still, Mr Saikawa and other Japanese executives within Nissan have spoken strongly against a merger. A Nissan lifer who was elevated to chief executive when Mr Ghosn stepped back from the role last year, Mr Saikawa has a reputation as a fierce defender of Nissan’s interests within its dealings with Renault.
Renault appeared to have been blindsided by Mr Ghosn’s arrest and the allegations that have drifted out. Its executives are suspicious of Nissan’s motives, demanding to see proof from the Japanese carmaker of the accusations against Mr Ghosn, people familiar with the matter have said.
Renault and Nissan have complicated cross-shareholdings, and poor relations would make operations difficult. The French carmaker is the largest shareholder in Nissan and has voting rights, while the Japanese company is the second-largest shareholder in Renault, with no votes.
